🔗 Share this article

Australia's decisive policy to prohibit social networking access for individuals under sixteen is sending ripples internationally. Lawmakers, safety advocates, and families are observing with great interest to see if this strategy will become a template for countries abroad.

Across Europe Momentum

Across Europe, a growing number of states are considering comparable bans.

• The Danish government has announced a ban on social media for youth below 15, with the leader declaring that phones and apps are "stealing our youngsters' youth". The policy could be enacted next year.
• Norway is preparing to enforce a age restriction of 15, pointing to the need to protect children from the "power of the algorithms".
• The Irish government is developing a digital wallet to verify the user details of social media account holders. The media minister have stated that an Australian-model ban remains "an options under consideration".
• In Spain, the president has urged the legislature to enact a law increasing the access age for using social media to 16.
• In France, the head of state has floated the idea of a ban for under-15s, and a parliamentary commission has recommended a comparable move, alongside an overnight "digital curfew" for older teenagers.
• The authorities in The Netherlands has urged guardians to block their youngsters from social media up to the age of 15.

Across the European Union, the bloc's legislature has adopted a symbolic statement supporting a ban for teenagers under 16 without parental consent is granted. While it warns of the "habit-forming" design of these platforms, the resolution does not establish enforceable legislation.

"A strong age barrier is a solid starting point," said the European lawmaker driving the resolution.

Britain: A Cautious Stance

In the UK, the leadership has kept open a potential ban, stating that "no measure is being dismissed" but stressing any policy must be "supported by strong research".

Last year, support grew behind a legislative effort to impose controls on social media use by teenagers, but it was ultimately modified. However, the government committed to further research the matter.

Campaign organizations have voiced apprehensions. An organization set up by the relatives of a teenager who took her own life after encountering dangerous social media material suggests that a strict age ban could fail to make platforms safer and could lead to a "cliff edge" of risk when teens become eligible.

"Australia's ban is a answer to the inability of the social media companies to build tools that are secure and fit for children," stated a prominent online safety campaigner.

The United States: A State-by-State Approach

Across America, legislation is primarily unfolding at the regional level amid national gridlock.

• Utah demands guardian permission for those under 18 to use social media and controls nighttime use.
• The state of Florida has signed a bill banning those below 14 from joining social media, though it is subject to court battles.
• Virginia has approved a rule restricting minors to one hour of social media time per day, with any further time needing parental permission.
• Georgia, The state of Tennessee, and Louisiana have similarly enacted bills demanding guardian approval for under-16s to create social media presences.

Despite cross-party agreement and suggestions from various politicians to follow this path, a US-wide ban is currently seen as a distant prospect.

International Outlook

Beyond these regions, further nations are also considering moves.

• Malaysia plans to restrict social media for teenagers effective next year.
• Brazil has increased the access age for the platform Instagram to 16.

However, international bodies take a more cautious tone. The UN children's agency has advised that social media bans carry risks and "may even have unintended consequences". The body notes that the internet can be a "critical link" for marginalized youth and that regulation should not be a "replacement" for tech companies to prioritize safety.

Even as this worldwide conversation continues, the actions of this nation and others demonstrate that governments globally are increasingly prepared to stand by for tech companies to self-regulate.